On Lazy Or Not Clued in.
Hi, Knucklehead98.
I once had the dubious privilege of running lever-steer 955's, both H and K series (That 955K was English-built AND powershift with lever-steer. ODD!) and an old 977H lever-steer.
Quote: "I didn't meen to offend anyone, but that is what I was always told was the main reason for not using the D-pedal. I can remember my Grandfather, running a old 977 with lever steer , He would shuffle his feet between the 2 pedals to get to it." Unquote.
To get to what? Yes, there were TWO pedals, both steering brake pedals, on those lever-steer machines. There was no decelerator pedal, only a hand throttle, unless somebody had gone to an awful lot of trouble to put in a decelerator, and where would they put it 'cos you already had a steering brake pedal under each foot? The pedal-steer machines did have a third pedal but it was 'brake-only' and activated both brakes without dis-engaging the steering clutches.
I almost always cut the revs on the hand throttle with Cat powershift track loaders before changing direction but that is just me and my neck is in pretty good shape. So were all those transmissions when I left them.
Quote: "Same went for our old A/C HD 19with the hand clutch and hand throttle." Unquote.
All I can say is that if your grandfather insisted on cutting the revs with the hand throttle on a stick-shift machine with a hand clutch before making a direction change, he would be about the only person I have ever heard of who did it. I always thought that was why those machines had a hand clutch, to make it easier to engage it smoothly and it was 'over-center' so that it would engage AND dis-engage more postively.
Or have I spent 43 years not being clued in? Am I allowed to be a little suspicious of your knowledge base?