• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

2020's? Possibly?

cat320

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
913
Location
Stoneham,MA
don't think i care for that if that was the case i would probale buy all iculd before that change over if i was using them.seams like it would not be as stable and probaly sink mor do to having the weight on four points instead of spread out .
 

iceberg210

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Messages
148
Location
Seattle (Newcastle/Auburn) WA
Really really cool ideas hopefully some of which will be implemented in the near future on new excavators. I would think a machine like that even today could sell pretty well if it were built without to many bugs and at a decent price competitive with other more conventional machinery.
 

digger242j

Administrator
Joined
Oct 31, 2003
Messages
6,703
Location
Southwestern PA
Occupation
Self employed excavator
It's hard to tell from the picture, but it looks as if each tracked section might adjust up and down, making it similar to the Schaeff walking excavator we had a thread about somewhere. (Too lazy to look it up right now.) That might be worth the compromise of a greater tendancy for each individual section to sink.
 

Deas Plant

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
1,533
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Concept machines.

Hi, Folks.
I wonder how much they pay the people who came up with that 'concept'. And how much 'wacky-baccy' do they give them while they're 'working' on these 'concepts'?

Firstly, you would lose a LOT of manouevrability by having 4 separate tracks like that plus it would be a LOT harder on the individual track frames and their legs and the undercarriage components simply because you don't have the middle section of the track to spin on. You are trying to force every part of the track sideways across/through the ground on every turn. You would virtually have to pick up one end or the other for every turn or have them all steerable like the wheeled excavators. And to steer them, you would have to make them turn individually on the ends of their legs. It's getting a little too complicated for this li'l black duck.

Next, I look at that skeleton boom and dipper and I think, "Jeez, I hope they do a better job of building that than they do on your average pin jib crane lattice 'cos they don't like sideways and twisting loads much at all. And what do excavators get constantly - sideways and twisting loads on the boom and dipper.

Now just for the mental exercise, can you imagine taking something like that into a rough shot rock face, cutting a bench, climbing up on top of said bench and loading dump trucks with the shot rock?

Just my 0.02 cents.
 

Dusty

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2003
Messages
178
Location
S.E PA
i watched the vid and its all a nice idea and we all know how far the machines have come and not really changed in many years
but i remember all the fly by wire will never work and it is working so who knows what will come true
 

MVFD

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
117
Location
Victoria BC
I think the original design will never change, but they may make something like this for different applications. It has its pros and cons. I would like to something like that on the market, but alot needs to be changed and redesigned. my 2 cents
 

Countryboy

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
3,276
Location
Georgia
Occupation
Load Out Tech. / Heavy Equipment Operator / Locomo
I try to keep an open mind to new ideas but I'm just not liking that one.
 

jazak

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
331
Location
NJ
ditto. just looks way odd. Also looks easir to to get stuck with 4 seperate tracks.
 
Top