• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Small faceshovel versus smaller conventional excavator

Willie B

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
5,023
Location
Mount Tabor VT
Occupation
Electrician
My dad bought a Koehring 405 front shovel in 1958 for use in building logging roads. That didn't work out at all so he installed a set of tongs on the end instead of the bucket for loading logs on trucks. Apparently that didn't work out profitably either because he pulled the shovel front off, installed a 60' crane boom and a clam shell bucket and used it to clear land. That worked until he passed in 1971. The front shovel was displaced by track and wheel loaders. The air tongs were displaced by heel boom loaders with live grapples and the clam shell would have been displaced by hydraulic excavators with thumbs for clearing land. Technology always moves forward in efficiently and displaces what came before.
In the evolution of machines I'm surprized how far we've come in so few years. My world is rural. No new technology comes here until it is profitable. First excavators came here in 1979 in the aftermath of a flood event when the Federal Government paid to ?dredge? miles of brook beds. Last year the decision came down: There will be NO dredging, even to save life & property.
 

materthegreater

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
2,118
Location
VT
In the evolution of machines I'm surprized how far we've come in so few years. My world is rural. No new technology comes here until it is profitable. First excavators came here in 1979 in the aftermath of a flood event when the Federal Government paid to ?dredge? miles of brook beds. Last year the decision came down: There will be NO dredging, even to save life & property.
Fish are more important than people now.
 

CM1995

Administrator
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
16,108
Location
Alabama
Occupation
Running what I brung and taking what I win
Bugs & worms too.
We used to have the end of the Town water line blow off above my house. When the Federal Government mandated we add chlorene, we couldn't blow it in the air any more. It might kill a bug or worm.

We do it down here all the time. Flush the line and the water runs down hill.

FD flows hydrants where ever the hydrant is located.
 

AMBMike

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
328
Location
Southeast KS
Occupation
Cat herder.
We do it down here all the time. Flush the line and the water runs down hill.

FD flows hydrants where ever the hydrant is located.

We do the same here.
One of the benefits of not living in the Northeast...
 

Willie B

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
5,023
Location
Mount Tabor VT
Occupation
Electrician
Our original system was built 1880. Up on Dorset Mountain, two natural springs were used to supply 200 homes, a number of farms, a village. It serves only the densley populated part of two towns.
Amazingly, 115 year old galvanized pipe still functioned until 1996. Nighttime pressure (gravity) reached 250 PSI, it was done to relieve pressure, delay leaks. The end of the system is above my house. Water sprayed 70 feet in the air, and formed a huge ice berg in winter
 
Last edited:

HarleyHappy

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2020
Messages
3,469
Location
So NH
Occupation
Welder/Mechanic
Our local FD used to flow test whatever hydrants there we’re, that did not run into trouble with flow testing and retention pond or the nut bags. Now according to the Fire Chief for our bunny hugging frog smokers, they aren’t even check most river and pond hydrant’s as the poor fishies might get hurt.
He told me, the one that was put in our ROW turnoff, was tried 2 years ago and it did like 10k in damages to the pumping units.
 

Willie B

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
5,023
Location
Mount Tabor VT
Occupation
Electrician
Our local FD used to flow test whatever hydrants there we’re, that did not run into trouble with flow testing and retention pond or the nut bags. Now according to the Fire Chief for our bunny hugging frog smokers, they aren’t even check most river and pond hydrant’s as the poor fishies might get hurt.
He told me, the one that was put in our ROW turnoff, was tried 2 years ago and it did like 10k in damages to the pumping units.
Our "NEW" system is NOT intended for fire fighting, no hydrants. We have clean out fixtures accept a 2" fire hose. We do have a great State program helps pay for dry hydrants. Mostly, land owners give rights to draw from ponds & streams. Our tiny two towns have dozens of these hydrants.
 

DDoug

Formerly digger doug
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
2,775
Location
NW Pennsylvania
Occupation
Thrash-A-Matic designer
Our local FD used to flow test whatever hydrants there we’re, that did not run into trouble with flow testing and retention pond or the nut bags. Now according to the Fire Chief for our bunny hugging frog smokers, they aren’t even check most river and pond hydrant’s as the poor fishies might get hurt.
He told me, the one that was put in our ROW turnoff, was tried 2 years ago and it did like 10k in damages to the pumping units.
I suggested to My friend in the local VFD, and who spearheaded putting in dry hydrants,
that maybe for testing, show up with a tanker full, and pressurize the line, to blow the silt away from the intake.
Backflushing as it were.
 
Top